<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Welcome to our site: You'll have to do the thinking for both of us</title>
    <link>http://www.trabian.com/articles/2006/02/27/youll-have-to-do-the-thinking-for-both-of-us</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description></description>
    <item>
      <title>You'll have to do the thinking for both of us</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;When we launched the new &lt;a href="http://www.usecreditunion.org"&gt;usecreditunion.org&lt;/a&gt; a few months back, I wrote a member poll question for the initial launch. It included an option meant to trick the poll respondent.  I asked, &amp;#8220;What do you like most about our new website?&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;A whopping 34% of respondents selected &amp;#8220;There&amp;#8217;s more information.&amp;#8221; However, &lt;em&gt;there wasn&amp;#8217;t any substantial amount of new information on the new site than on the old one&lt;/em&gt;. (That is, aside from having the content available En Espa?ħol along with a couple of short news articles about phishing and the new website itself.)&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;How can that be?!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3&gt;The results&lt;/h3&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;The poll received 140 votes (we only allowed each IP address to vote once to discourage repeat voting), and respondents could choose to answer &amp;#8220;What do you like most about our new website?&amp;#8221; with one of the following:&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;It&amp;#8217;s more modern (51 votes &amp;#8211; 36%)&lt;/li&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;It&amp;#8217;s better organized (34 votes &amp;#8211; 24%)&lt;/li&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;There&amp;#8217;s more information (47 votes &amp;#8211; 34%)&lt;/li&gt;
		&lt;li&gt;I recognize the faces and places (8 votes &amp;#8211; 6%)&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;/ul&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;But if there wasn&amp;#8217;t significantly more information, why did users think there was?  Part of the answer lies in Information Architecture (IA), concisely defined on &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_architecture"&gt;Wikipedia&lt;/a&gt; as the art and science of structuring knowledge (technically data) and defining user interactions.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;I watched &lt;a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0034583/"&gt;Casablanca&lt;/a&gt; last night for the umpteenth time.  Remember the scene where Ilsa pleads to Rick, &amp;#8220;You&amp;#8217;ll have to do the thinking for both of us.&amp;#8221;  That&amp;#8217;s a great way to sum up what an Information Architect does; well-designed IA makes a user not have to think about what he&amp;#8217;s doing on a website.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;A great site is intuitive enough for users to go &lt;em&gt;correctly&lt;/em&gt; with their instincts about where information will reside before a link is clicked. That&amp;#8217;s why the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;USE&lt;/span&gt; site&amp;#8217;s users thought there was more information &amp;#8211; it&amp;#8217;s organized more intuitively.  We did the thinking for them when we rebuilt the site.  (Just try the &lt;a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20040921223317/http://usecreditunion.org/"&gt;Wayback Machine&lt;/a&gt; for a before-and-after view of the site.)&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;h3&gt; On another subject &amp;#8230;&lt;/h3&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Matt just showed me the latest feature of our Content Management System (used by our clients to make changes to their sites) &amp;#8211; &lt;strong&gt;versioning&lt;/strong&gt;!  Holy moly!  Now a page&amp;#8217;s content can be restored to earlier versions after changes are made.  That&amp;#8217;s huge.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:59:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:9ec18938-295b-4b67-ac62-d6bfe7e52360</guid>
      <author>trey@trabian.com (Trey Reeme)</author>
      <link>http://www.trabian.com/articles/2006/02/27/youll-have-to-do-the-thinking-for-both-of-us</link>
      <category>Client Sites</category>
      <category>Usability</category>
      <category>Information Architecture</category>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.trabian.com/articles/trackback/71</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
