Sideways marketing

By Brent Dixon on November 15, 2006

5 Comments

Media consumption and interaction are no longer linear. What in the world does that mean? I’ll tell you -

With the accessibility of on-demand media, it means that from the content-producer perspective, time is no longer a huge factor in consumption. To use our own Matt Dean as an example, it means that he doesn’t watch The Office on TV at 7:30 on Thursdays. He downloads it through iTunes and watches it whenever he pleases.

Meanwhile, consumers themselves are creating distribution channels through blogs, podcasts, bittorrent networks, text messages, YouTube, water-cooler conversations, the effects of links on search engine results, and a slew of other things I haven’t thought of. The majority of this consumer generated content is on-demand too.

Because of this, communications do not move along a specified path, they bounce around willy-nilly. Marketers, this is especially important to you because you can no longer think in terms of top-down distribution for your marketing. When you speak, it’s important to understand (and capitalize on) the channels that message will fly through.

We’ll call this “sideways marketing,” and it involves viewing and reaching consumers by recognizing their distribution channels, and making yourself accessible and deliverable through those.

A few examples

Campbell-Ewald’s Chief Contact Officer (cool title) Ed Dilworth (less cool name) gave a session at ad:tech entitled “Navigating the Current of Participatory Communication” that broke down how his firm was flipping clients on their sides.

For their clients, it means everything from setting up corporate blogs to asking consumers to create an ‘07 Super Bowl spot to setting up farmer’s markets throughout the U.S.

Separately, Jay-Z and Coca-Cola distributed a live performance video, embedded with promotions for Coke, through illegal file-sharing networks. Jay-Z’s stereotypically-named lawyer, Mike Guido, said this about the strategy:

“The concept here is making the peer-to-peer networks work for us. While peer-to-peer users are stealing the intellectual property, they are also the active music audience…this technology allows us to market back to them.”

On your own site

Because many search results point directly to internal site pages, the homepage is less significant. People are gaining sideways entry into your site, and your design should reflect this. Embrace this by:

  • Tracking the search results that are pointing people to your site using tools like Mint.
  • Tracking which internal pages are receiving the most traffic.
  • Making sure your internal pages have calls to action and links that cross pollinate the rest of the site.
  • Design a clear information architecture that is easily navigable even in the deepest reaches of your site.

Listen

Step one in all of this is to listen to and understand your consumer. How else can you understand how they’re communicating, where they’re creating content, and how they’re accessing and redistributing yours? Once you understand this, it’s simply a matter of working with them.

Filed under: , , , , , ,

Comments

  • Paul on November 16

    I like your input on making sure internal pages have full navigation. My sites have full nav from all pages. I will have to go check out Mint though. Good to meet you today – we’ll talk again in Crayonville. pdvd

  • Brent on November 16

    Great meeting you too dude. Mint is definitely a worthwhile investment to anyone with a website. It brings a huge amount of info to the table, and at a one-time fee of $30, you can’t beat the price.

    We check ours regularly with obsessive compulsive excitement.

    (No, I’m not getting paid for this endorsement.)

  • andrea on November 27

    So…is Mint what we need now, instead of Urchin? Pros/cons vs Urchin?

  • Brent on November 29

    There are definitely benefits to both:

    Urchin (aka Google Analytics) offers a lot more data. It goes back farther in time than Mint, gives more specifics about referrals and internal traffic, and subdivides its data into marketing, conversion, and content-specific data. It also allows you to view data on a site overlay lets you see the click-rankings for your site links from a page location perspective.

    Because you’re dealing with so much information, it gets pretty convoluted. It can be tough to navigate because there are so many options in front of you.

    Mint, on the other hand, is much simpler, but still thorough. All of the information is displayed on one page.

    We use Mint on our own site because, honestly, we don’t need a lot of the data Urchin provides. Click here to check out a screenshot of Mint for Open Source CU.

    Mint is better for day to day updates on site trends, Urchin is better for the long-term.

    That said, Urchin is free, so there’s really no reason why you couldn’t have them both running on your site at once and use each for their best features.

  • lucy fang on September 06

    Hangers, Yes hangers!! We supply metal wire hangers with good quality and low price!Please contact us to know more!From China!Thanks for your patience! yiyingfang1985@yahoo.com.cn

Required Field